Sunday, June 7, 2009

Small wind turbine works at low wind speeds

Homeowners this fall will be able to buy a wind turbine at hardware stores that tackles the small wind industry'sbete noire: slow wind.

WindTronics, based in Muskegon, Mich., has developed a wind turbine sized for individual homes that it says can operate at speeds as low as 2 miles an hour.

It will be sold for $4,500 as the Honeywell Wind Turbine and distributed through Ace Hardware stores in the U.S. starting in October. WindTronics developed the turbine and licensed the technology to buildings systems giant Honeywell.

The fan-like turbine will generate 2,000 kilowatt-hours in a year for a home with a very good--called Class 4--wind resource, according to the company. That's between 15 and 20 percent of the annual electricity consumption for the average U.S. home.

Turning a turbine inside out: rather than having power generation occur at a gear box in the shaft, WindTronic's turbine has magnets at the edges of the fan to generate a current.

(Credit: WindTronics)

The turbine is rated at 2 kilowatts, but WindTronics executives say that most turbines' rated capacities--the amount of power they can produce at a given moment--are misleading.

"We say if a turbine only works between 8 and 25 miles per hour, you have a very limited range of operation," said Brian Levine, the vice president of business development at WindTronics, a division of EarthTronics. "Our device is rated to address a wider range at the low and high end."

The 95-pound turbine, which is 6 feet in diameter, can be mounted on rooftops, attached to chimneys, or put on a pole. The company hopes to sell the turbines through Ace Hardware stores or through contractors--who are needed for the installation--to homeowners or businesses.

Spinning magnets
With people seeking out alternative forms of power generation, there's been a surge in interest--and sales--in small wind turbines in the past year. But it's still not clear that these small wind turbines are cost-effective enough to be used beyond a niche of green-minded buyers.

Two studies--one in Massachusetts and one in the U.K.--discovered that many small wind turbines far underperformed manufacturers' specifications.

The tests found that people often chose locations that didn't have sufficient wind or obstructions that blocked wind. In most cases, turbine makers rate products assuming a very good wind resource--anywhere from 12 to 25 miles per hour.

By using a novel design, WindTronics' turbine can generate electricity between 2 miles per hour and 45 miles per hour, the company says.

Typically, turbines convert the mechanical energy of spinning blades to electricity with a gearbox and generator in the turbine's nacelle, the enclosure where the rotor's shaft is mounted.

WindTronic's turbine has small magnets at the tips of its fan blades. When they spin from the wind, equipment in the fan's housing captures the current produced.

The installation kit also comes with an inverter to convert the direct current to household alternating current and a "smart box," which regulates the flow of electricity and monitors wind speed. At 45 miles per hour, the unit turns itself sideways to avoid damage.

Levine, who said the turbine was originally developed for developing countries, said WindTronics expects it can produce 50,000 units in its first year. A number of utilities, including Duke Energy, are testing the turbine, he added.

He said that mounting the turbine on a house should not cause vibration because the unit is lighter than most turbines. The sound is rated at between 35 and 45 decibels, which is quieter than normal conversation, Levine said.

Right problem
There is a growing number of companies designing turbines to operate in less-than-ideal wind conditions. A wind map from the Department of Energy shows that most of the fair and good wind--class 3 and class 4--is in the plains states and on the coasts of the continental U.S.

One technique to squeeze more power from available wind is to concentrate the wind to increase the speed of the air going past rotor blades. OptiWind, FloDesign Wind Turbine, and Green Energy Tech are among the companies exploring that approach in small or mid-size turbines.

Other turbine manufacturers, like WindTronics, use permanent magnets in a direct drive design rather than gearboxes to generate electricity.

WindTronics has only built prototype systems, which it first showed at a hardware show last month. But if its turbines can operate in low wind with little vibration and sound, the company could make small wind turbines economically attractive to a much larger audience.

________________________________________________________________
Interview: Dr Akbar Yezdani on music licensing & record labels:
http://tr.im/nIrL

Internet advertising slumps in first quarter

Spending on Internet advertising took a big drop in the first quarter of 2009 as troubles across the broader economy took their toll.

For the three-month period, Internet advertising revenue in the U.S. was $5.5 billion, down a notable 5 percent from the $6.1 billion for the fourth quarter of 2008, according to a report Friday from the Interactive Advertising Bureau and PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Internet ad revenue, 2001-2009(Credit: Interactive Advertising Bureau/PricewaterhouseCoopers)

Aside from a handful of smaller quarterly declines, Internet advertising revenue has risen steadily since the middle of 2002, as the sector began to recover from the dot-com bust.

The IAB put a positive spin on the first quarter's downward motion.

"Consumers are spending more and more time with interactive media. For this, and other reasons, interactive media continues to gain share of marketing spend." Randall Rothenberg, president and CEO of the IAB, said in a statement. "We're confident that growth will resume as the U.S. economic climate improves. Interactive advertising is the most accountable way to reach consumers--and in this economy, digital media will be a core component of any successful marketing campaign."

Internet companies such as Yahoo are banking on businesses continuing to migrate to online advertising.

"Your brand is not defined by 20 keywords. You have to put a persona out there," Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz saidWednesday at a luncheon with Wall Street analysts, talking about the potential allure of online display or video advertising to businesses used to buying ad time on television. But, she said, Internet ad sales forces need to get rid of some of the friction in their line of work that isn't there on the TV side.

________________________________________________________________

Down Under gets first dibs on Windows 7

The first retail sales of Windows 7 will take place in New Zealand and Australia on 22 October, Microsoft confirmed this week.

Windows 7 install button(Credit: Renai LeMay/ZDNet.com.au)

Windows 7 will hit first New Zealand, then Australia, due to the countries' placement with respect to the International Date Line. Microsoft announced last week that its new operating system would hit retail shelves and start showing up on new PCs from October 22.

"Our understanding at this time is that the availability of Windows 7 will 'follow the sun' on Thursday October 22," a Microsoft spokesperson said late this week. "As such, we're excited that the first retail sales globally of Windows 7 will take place in New Zealand and Australia as we cross the dateline ahead of other markets."

A number of large Australian organizations including National Australia Bank, Commonwealth Bank of Australia and Centrelink have already started examining Windows 7, and companies as large as Telstra have flagged their intention to eventually migrate to the platform.

ZDNet.com.au has also been informed by many early adopters that they have had positive experiences with Windows 7 after testing it on their home PCs in preparation for upgrading to the platform from Vista or XP installations.

Microsoft Australia could not confirm at this stage what upgrade programs would be available to locals. However, globally Microsoft has confirmed, without giving details, that it plans to offer some sort of "technology guarantee" giving those who buy Vista machines close to the Windows 7 launch a free or discounted copy of the new operating system.

As with past similar programs, details on pricing will be up to individual computer makers, although Microsoft did say the upgrade program will apply to Vista Home Premium and higher-priced editions (meaning not Windows Vista Basic).

The tech guarantee program is not beginning immediately, but Microsoft did raise the possibility it will offer some sort of lower-cost upgrade to those who are already using Windows Vista.

________________________________________________________________

And Moses asked God: Is Mac better than Windows?

I once was a God-fearing Windows user. But when an Apple shrine, uh, store opened in my area, I began to ask myself the age-old question that has confounded even the greatest biblical prophets: Is theMac better?

I avoided the Mac for years for the usual reason cited by the Windows faithful: a dearth of hardware and software. (The so-called Mac tax was never really an issue for me.) That said, I won't go into a broad platform critique because I risk rehashing Windows-versus-Mac religious arguments that have been repeated millions of times for (digital-age) eons. (Besides, I'll leave that faith-based debate to the digerati of the world.)

Suffice to say, I now use a MacBook full time. Though, in the spirit of complete disclosure, I do have a Vista-based HP tower that I still use when there's something I absolutely can't do on the Mac. And, no, I have not gone the Boot Camp or virtual machine route yet.

So, without getting into an unwieldy philosophical argument, there are some nuts-and-bolts things that make the transition a challenge (and it's different for everyone, as every user has different needs.)

And one more disclaimer: I'm writing this from the perspective of a Mac neophyte/new user. Not as a seasoned Macophile that can instantly troubleshoot issues as they pop up.

Docking stations (lack thereof): This is a biggie. I had grown attached to the convenience of Hewlett-Packard docking stations. Apple should have connectors for docking stations (or port-replicators) built into MacBooks. The ease of popping an HP business laptop--which I had been using for years--in and out of a docking station cannot be overstated.

Microsoft Entourage: This is not the Windows Outlook equivalent. In a word, it's slow. In two words, very slow. (Note: I can't use the OS X "Mail" client because it can't run the email programs that I use.)

Web compatibility: All things should be equal here. But they're not. Like many people, I use both Safari andFireFox. Last week, there was a live video stream that, while it loaded on my MacBook Air, wouldn't run. The applet was there but it wasn't streaming. I didn't have time to figure out why it wasn't streaming. I just needed it to work. Out of desperation, I tried it on the Vista-based HP tower. It streamed immediately. In my book, that's a problem. And generally, on many Web sites that I use, Windows Media Player (that is, WMP v.11) is more adept at streaming video than the applets that come standard on the Mac OS X platform.

OS X local search: OS X local search is great (e.g., Spotlight) but it won't let me exclusively search a folder full of JPEG files. This issue was validated by a Mac "Genius" at my local Apple Store who admitted it was "odd." Let me repeat, an Apple Genius verified that I could not do this. Of course, I can find these files a dozen other ways but there's an application I use everyday that would be a lot easier to use if I could search JPEG files exclusively in that folder.

(Update: After a second visit to my local Apple Store and a separate discussion about changing the user short name--which the Genius did, as this process is a little tricky--I can now do JPEG searches on one of my MacBooks. I do not know how this came to be fixed, however, as it was an unintended consequence.)

Hardware compatibility--in this case, camcorders: I found this out quite by accident. I was in my local Best Buy (Southern California) and overheard one of those illuminating matter-of-fact dialogs between a customer and a salesperson. "Are all of these camcorders Mac compatible?"--the customer asked. "No," the salesman said. "Only the Panasonic and Canon." After the salesman was done helping the customer, I followed up with more queries. The upshot: Most other brands are not Mac-compatible, according to the Best Buy sales force. Does a Best Buy salesperson always know the bottom-line, gospel truth about hardware compatibility? Probably not. But the larger point is that's what he is telling customers. And it's always an ugly reminder of that cliche that a lot hardware is not compatible with the Mac.

The Mac philosophy of how to use external displays: This, I suppose, is more a philosophical argument than a practical argument. But, to me, the way Windows handles external displays (with a laptop) using Fn-F4 is straightforward and extremely practical. And--returning to the lack-of-a-docking-station argument--inserting/removing a laptop into/from an HP dock is so well executed that it becomes second nature to the user: the internal laptop display shuts off, the external display goes on, and the external display automatically adjusts the resolution. Again, this may be partially a case of me simply being more accustomed to the Windows way of doing things--but not completely: Windows wins the ease-of-use award here.

No built-in 3G option: I've talked about this before in other posts. HP, Dell, and others offer integrated 3G connectivity. That said, I fully expect that this will become less of an issue when 4G hits, as I am confident that Apple is savvy enough to stay in front of this trend.

Of course, the list goes on (lack of development momentum from some software vendors on the Mac, being another minus often cited). But I would be remiss at this point to not preemptively answer the critics who will say, "Well, if you're going to whine all the time, go back to Windows you a#%*!#@." (And that's putting it charitably. Mac minions tend to be slightly more contemptuous.)

The reason I switched to Mac (if anyone really cares) was hardware, not software. I looked at all of the HP, Dell, Lenovo, and Sony laptops and saw nothing that came close to a MacBook Air. Not even remotely close. The Air is an incomparably well-balanced design that is light, fast, and aesthetically a knockout, to boot. The other unibody MacBooks inherit these attributes too.

Oh yeah, Mac OS X beats Windows in a lot of ways. You can run Windows, after all, if you choose, with Boot Camp or VMware Fusion. And all of the well-known virtues are true. You're not constantly on Virus/Worm/Malware alert, the interface is more intuitive in some ways, it's more streamlined than Vista, it boots faster, and the list goes on. I guess I can live without a docking station--for now.

So, as of summer 2009, which is better, Windows or Mac? Dare I ask?

________________________________________________________________

Saturday, June 6, 2009

Palm Pre Features Compared with Apple's New iPhone (Leaked Specs) & iPhone OS 3.0

Couple of weeks ago, I had compared Palm Pre with iPhone 3G. Now it's time for the real deal, yes, a comparison between Palm Pre which goes on sale today and the new iPhone (specs are based on details provided by Daring Fireball's John Gruber and those posted by an Apple fan blog). I enjoyed comparing both the smartphones and I hope that you enjoy reading it too.

When I first posted the comparison between Palm Pre and the existing iPhone, a lot of users called it an unfair comparison and rightly so. Apple is expected to announce their third generation iPhone at WWDC which is expected to up the ante with hardware improvements bundled with iPhone OS 3.0.


et us begin the comparison between the hardware features of both Palm Pre and the new iPhone.


Hardware Specifications:

This comparison is based on the specs that an iPhone fan blog had claimed were of Apple’s new iPhone based on a source close to Apple's hardware team. Most rumors and speculations about Apple’s next generation iPhone have suggested that they aren’t too far fetched. Palm Pre vs new iPhone

In case of Palm Pre, the battery is removable which will make many users happy.

But, in my opinion, the new iPhone is a clear winner here thanks to (a) 3.2 megapixel camera with the autofocus as well as bring video recording capabilities, (b) Storage capacity of 32GB, (c) Slightly bigger screen size.

We don't have information on the RAM that will be available in Palm Pre, Apple's new iPhone is expected to have 256MB RAM up from 128MB RAM in current iPhone models.

The digital compass is another feature but I’m not too excited about it.

Winner: New iPhone

There are rumors that the new iPhone could also come with anOLED screen, which will greatly improve the battery life and front facing camera for video calling. If that happens then Apple’s next generation iPhone will be miles ahead of Palm Pre.

Messaging:

Both Palm Pre and Apple’s new iPhone (thanks to iPhone OS 3.0) will support SMS and MMS. Sprint will allow Palm Pre users to do instant messaging on multiple IM networks, and the same will be possible on the new iPhone thanks to instant messaging apps likeBeejiveIM.

We have the unending saga about the battle of physical keyboard vs. the virtual one. Opinions vary and so does users choice. Hence, I will leave this to the consumers to decide. For some it's a real deal maker and for some it’s just a matter of getting-used-to.

For email usage, both will support the IMAP and Microsoft Exchange. Both will support the calendar feature where as Palm Pre will come with a to-do-list.

As covered earlier, Palm Pre's Synergy (Palm's personal information management system) will sync contacts, calendars etc to the cloud.

Reports have indicated that Palm Pre will come with the 'Documents to Go', Adobe Reader which means that Pre will support document editing and viewing of PDF files. In case of the iPhone, its possible to achieve it with iPhone app - QuickOffice app.

Winner: It’s a tie

Processing Power:

Palm Pre's ARM Cortex Processor will be matched by the new iPhone's improved but unspecified processer. The new iPhone'sprocessor is speculated to be running at 600 MHz, matching Palm Pre's.

Winner: The processing power of both smartphones is comparable on paper but how will they fare in the real world remains to be seen. It’s a tie.

Operating System:

The Push notification is Apple's answer to Palm Pre's multi-tasking capability. Users are more than aware of how important it is to have this capability. An instant messaging app would be able to notify the user of an incoming message even when this app is not running. iPhone's limited battery life has kept this necessary feature out of reach but Apple looks to bridge this gap with Push Notification.

Palm Pre's web OS will come with multi-tasking capabilities and it looks quite user friendly. But it will be interesting to see how this affects battery life, initial reviews suggest battery life isn’t very good.

Copy-Paste: Both Palm Pre and iPhone OS 3.0 will support the basic capability of being able to Copy-Paste content.

Universal Search: Both Palm Pre and iPhone OS 3.0 will come with a universal search. Palm Pre's OS will support this feature while in case of the new iPhone, iPhone OS 3.0 will include Spotlight for iPhone, which is Apple's universal search solution for the iPhone.

Winner: There is no clear winner as Apple has cleverly included all the features that Palm Pre is trying to claim as its Unique Selling Points.

However, the ability to run apps in the background is touted by many as one of the killer features of Palm Pre.

App Store Comparison:

There is simply no worthy opponent to Apple in this area. The App Store has an almost unparalleled features and an incomparable range of apps that help us with the day-to-day mundane stuff as well as with the more complicated ones. I haven't heard of any game plan from Palm that aims at tackling this.

iPhone OS 3.0 will bring In-App purchase which will make the App Store even more attractive to iPhone developers.

Apple might not be making a lot of money with the App Store but it adds to the stickiness which is invaluable.

Winner: New iPhone

Price Comparison:

The overall cost to consumer could be a reasonable big factor in this comparison. Sprint will offer Palm Pre at a price tag of $199 (with two year contract and after the $100 mail-in rebate), which is the same price at which AT&T offers iPhone (16 GB iPhone, two year contract).

Sprint’s monthly plans will be priced at $69.99 and $89.99 with a choice of 450 or 900 anytime minutes respectively. Now, AT&T requires a $30-per-month data plan, a further $39.99 for the 450 minutes and an additional $20 per month for unlimited text messaging. Thus AT&T comes $20 dearer compared to Sprint's data plan.

The question remains that will users switch from AT&T to Sprint; Sprint still lags in terms of having a more reliable network and service levels.

Winner: There is no clear winner in this situation but Sprint's 'Everything Data' plan might have an edge.

Other features:

I was very impressed with Palm Pre's wireless charging device. The user will be able to charge Palm Pre by simply placing it on a wireless charging dock, the magnets in the dock will align the phone in the correct position for charging. Unfortunately, this wireless charging kit has to be bought separately and will cost $69.99.

In iPhone OS 3.0, Apple will be allowing accessory manufacturers to create iPhone applications to interface with their hardware accessories over Bluetooth. I think this has huge potential based on the demo given by Johnson and Johnson at Apple’s special even in March, showing off their medical iPhone app which works with a small dock connector over Bluetooth serving as a finger pricking device for glucose testing.

Conclusion:

Apple has developed a habit of staying ahead of the competition. In my opinion, the hardware improvements in the next generation iPhone and iPhone OS 3.0; it continue to remain ahead of its competition.

Palm Pre looks quite impressive (on paper) but its performance can be truly gauged after it enters the real world! Its the first device which has come close to giving Apple iPhone some serious competition (at least on paper and the buzz that it has generation) which is great (and kudos to Palm engineers for that) as it will force Apple to keep innovating aggressively which is ultimately great for end users like us.

I want to also note that this might be an unfair comparison as we are comparing Palm Pre with Apple’s next generations whose features are based on rumors and speculations. I will revisit this comparison when I find out more about Palm Pre and also when Apple’s new iPhone becomes official. You can also check mycomparison of Palm Pre with iPhone 3G.

My money is on Apple’s new iPhone and the iPhone OS 3.0. How about you? I am curious to hear your opinion, so please feel free to drop me a line in the comments section.

________________________________________________________________

Palm Pre's Big Day

NEW YORK--The much-anticipated Palm Pre may have gotten almost as much hype as the Apple iPhone over the past six months, but its opening day fell short of the attention iPhones grabbed on their first days.

The Sprint store in the Flatiron building on Manhattan's Fifth Ave. received nearly 200 Palm Pres for the launch.

(Credit: Marguerite Reardon/CNET)

Unlike the huge crowds of people that formed long lines and camped out in front of Apple and AT&T stores days in advance of the iPhone's launch, crowds for the Palm Pre were much smaller and tended to arrive in the morning just before stores opened.

Neither Sprint nor Palm have released official figures about how many devices they hoped to sell on the Pre's first day. But Sprint representatives had been trying to downplay expectations for iPhone-like crowds ahead of the launch. Sprint spokesman Mark Elliott told The New York Timesearlier this week that the company not only didn't expect long lines for the Pre at its 1,100 stores, but that it didn't want them.

And it looks like the company got its wish. Salespeople at Sprint stores in New York City said a handful of people gathered outside their locations early Saturday morning. But most lines didn't even come close to the madness experienced on iPhone launch days.

Crowds tended to be bigger at Best Buy stores, which were offering the device for the $199 price without the $100 mail-in rebate. Customers buying a Pre from Sprint, the exclusive carrier of the device, pay $299 at the time of purchase and can get $100 back with a mail-in rebate. According to Rich Pesce, a Sprint spokesman, most new phones offered through the carrier have the mail-in rebate offer.

Many Best Buy locations sold out of the Pre almost immediately. But considering that Best Buy stores received far fewer devices for the launch than Sprint retail locations, it shouldn't come as a huge surprise that they'd run out of inventory earlier than the Sprint stores. For example, the Best Buy store on 23rd Street in New York City got somewhere between 40 and 48 phones for Saturday's launch, while the Sprint store two blocks away on Fifth Avenue in the Flatiron building received nearly 200 phones for the launch.

Even though the crowds and the hoopla may not have matched those of the iPhone, the Pre likely had a good first day. Sprint salespeople in Manhattan said they had a steady stream of customers for most of the day. And the Sprint store on Fifth Avenue only had six phones left as of 2:30 p.m. EDT Saturday.

(Credit: CNET)

Since the Pre's debut at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas in January, smartphone junkies have been closely tracking the device's progress as it moved toward commercial availability. Many of the people who showed up to Sprint's pre Pre-launch party in New York Friday said they had been following news and hype of the phone since it was announced.

Many of these new customers, including Mark McNulty of Westchester County, New York, are loyal Palm fans who have been long waiting for a new and better Palm smartphone.

"Palm has always had a long history as a smartphone company," he said. "And they've always been the best smartphone for calendars and handling work documents."

Pre's success is considered crucial for Palm, which was a pioneer in the smartphone market. But in the past couple of years, the company has been struggling to compete against other smartphone makers, namely Apple and Research In Motion, which makes the BlackBerry devices.

The Pre's success isn't just important to Palm. Sprint Nextel, which currently has an exclusive deal to carry the Pre, also has a lot riding on the success of the device. Sprint, the third largest wireless operator in the U.S., has been struggling to stem customer defections and repair a badly damaged reputation. At an event here Friday, Sprint CEO Dan Hesse called the Pre Sprint's coming-out party for the company's enhanced wireless network and much improved customer support.

First impressions of the phone have been very positive. Reviewers, such as CNET's Bonnie Cha, have been impressed with Palm's new webOS, which powers the Pre. A key feature highlighted in her review is the Pre's ability to allow users to have multiple applications or Web pages open on the phone at once, something the Apple's iPhone doesn't allow.

A new Palm Pre customer gets a tutorial on her phone in a Sprint store in New York City.

(Credit: Marguerite Reardon/CNET)

Most reviewers agree that the Pre's software makes it a much stronger competitor to the iPhone than other touch-screen devices, such as the BlackBerry Storm. But no one is expecting the Pre to rival the iPhone in terms of sales, at least not initially while it's available on only one carrier's network.

Analysts have been all over the map in terms of sales expectations for the Pre, but Macquarie Securities analyst Philip Cusick thinks Palm and Sprint will likely sell about 1 million device a quarter. And he believes the company will sell about 6 million devices in fiscal 2011.

By comparison, AT&T activated roughly 2.4 million iPhone 3Gs in the first quarter it was available. About 1 million BlackBerry Bold devices were sold through AT&T in its first full quarter. And Verizon Wireless sold roughly 2 million BlackBerry Storms in its first quarter.

Meanwhile, Apple is not sitting still. The company is expected to announce a new iPhone next week at the company's Worldwide Developers Conference in San Francisco. Most iPhone watchers don't expect any major hardware enhancements, but there has been lots of chatter that Apple may announce a 4GB entry-level iPhone, as well as a 32GB video iPhone. These new phones, along with new enhancements to the iPhone OS, will likely make it even more difficult for the new Pre to compete.________________________________________________________________

$170 In Hardware In Palm Pre

A teardown of the new Palm Pre by Rapid Repair shows $170.02 in hardware components.

Their detailed disassembly guide requires a small phillips screw driver, small flathead, pliers, solder iron, exacto razor & safe open tool.

If anyone feels like taking apart their new phone the instructions are linked here.

________________________________________________________________