Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Mahalo 2.0 is Wikipedia plus money


Jason Calacanis, CEO of Mahalo, is modifying his business once again. He's taking a page from Wikipedia and opening up his curated topic pages to user editing. The big difference from Wikipedia is that he's melding this idea with the Mahalo Answers business model in which users are paid for contributing content to the site.

"It's fine that Wikipedia believes that writers shouldn't be compensated," Calacanis told me. "We need to get out of the page creation business and move to the next level."

Here's how Mahalo 2.0 is going to do it:

Registered Mahalo users will be able to "claim" pages on the site. For example, if you're an expert in Betty Boop trivia, you'd claim the Betty Boop page. You'd be responsible for keep the content on the page relevant and fresh. In return, you will get half the advertising revenue (Mahalo uses Google AdSense) that the page generates.

This means that not only will Mahalo's users be creating the content, but since they're invested in the traffic to their pages, they'll likely be doing some of their own marketing for the content as well--on Twitter, Facebook, and so on.

There will also be a way to embed a Mahalo topic widget in another page. Calacanis will pay users a small amount for widget impressions, but the real goal for these widgets is to drive traffic back to the main Mahalo site.

Pages are given out only to registered users, and the number of a pages a user can claim depends on their "belt" level on the service (white belts can claim only two pages, for example). If a user who owns a page doesn't keep it maintained, then the system can take it back and puts in on the leaderboard where another user can grab it.

In Mahalo 2.0, that's the extent of ownership transactions. In 2.1, maybe, users will be able to sell the pages they're maintaining. Calacanis speculated that Mahalo might take a fee for enabling the transfer of control from one user to another.

Mahalo users can "claim" pages and edit them with improved page-building tools.

(Credit: Mahalo)

A necessary part of the new system is Mahalo's new and improved authoring interface. Replacing MediaWiki, which Mahalo has been using to date, the new tool builds the framework of a Web page from search results, lets the page owner pin items from search to the page, re-order items, and easily add explanatory text and media.

As he's done before (with Weblogs Inc. and with Mahalo so far), Calacanis is blending emerging media types with a clever application of raw capitalism. His theory, in keeping with his past ventures, is sound. The trick is the execution. For Mahalo, that hinges on people landing on the user-created pages because they are directed there from other search engines' results pages. Mahalo relies on search engine optimization, just as About.com did when it got started.

Opinions on Mahalo's success on this effort so far differ. Calacanis, of course, quotes increasing traffic and engagement results. Most people I talk to, though, don't see Mahalo results pop up in their daily search engine use and can't remember the last time they used the site.

My experience is more positive. I see Mahalo popping up from time to time. When I visit its pages, I find them generally very useful. Regardless, giving end users direct benefits for editing Mahalo pages will encourage them to take on some of the marketing expenses themselves, by promoting their pages. Assuming those promotions get picked up in search engines, it could help make these pages more visible. So this scheme should work better for Mahalo than its current model.

Mahalo may never be a household name like Google or Wikipedia. But it doesn't need to be. With a devoted cadre of users editing its most popular pages, and with successful search engine optimization being driven by Mahalo staffers and by users, the service should be able to sustain itself.

Wolfram Alpha holding live Q&A Thursday

Wolfram Research's Stephen Wolfram will take live questions over the Internet Thursday on Wolfram Alpha.

(Credit: Wolfram Research)

Wolfram Research is looking for feedback on its new Wolfram Alpha service.

The company plans to hold a Webcast Thursday at 2 p.m. PDT on Justin.tv to discuss Wolfram Alpha, now entering its third week of existence. "We thought you'd enjoy hearing Stephen Wolfram respond to some of this feedback directly," Wolfram said in a blog post Monday afternoon.

CNET readers had plenty of feedback for Wolfram Alpha following its initial debut, marred by technical glitches and an incomplete understanding of how the service was meant to be used. Anyone who didn't get a chance to pose their comments, or still had questions after our comprehensive look at Wolfram Alpha, might want to participate in the Webcast.

We'll also be watching the Webcast, and will report on the questions and answers posed to Stephen Wolfram on Thursday afternoon.

INQ phone lets you tweet for cheap

It's all in INQ Mobile's Twitter feed from Tuesday, and appropriately so: "Yes, you guessed it. A Twitter phone from us is imminent!"

INQ1

The Twitter phone isn't expected to arrive until the holiday season, but here's the INQ1, or Facebook phone, shown at CES in January.

(Credit: Nicole Lee/CBS Interactive)

The same U.K.-based cell phone maker that launched the Facebook and Skype phones will be introducing the Twitter phone--the latest in its line of "social networking phones"--by the end of the year.

"This can really help open up and drive Twitter use on mobile when usage becomes part of your data package like on the PC," INQ Chief Executive Frank Meehan told Reuters earlier Tuesday.

The device lets users tweet on the go without having to paythe high prices of smartphones like the iPhone and BlackBerry. According to Reuters, the Twitter phone will cost carriers less than $140.

The Facebook phone, officially called the INQ1, won a 2009 Global Mobile Award for best mobile handset. The INQ1 (CNET editors' take here) comes with Facebook, Skype, Yahoo, Google, eBay, and Windows Messenger built-in, and it also supports Java and BREW, so other applications like MySpace can be added.

Traffic for the INQ1, Reuters reports, is three to four times higher than other phones in its cell phone network, 3 UK. Since introducing its Skype phone in 2007, INQ mobile has sold 700,000 of their social-networking phones.

INQ Mobile and 3 UK are owned by the same umbrella company--Hong Kong-based Hutchison Whampoa; INQ's phones have not yet been picked up by other cell phone carriers.

New malware attack infecting Web sites


Security firm Websense has put out an advisory warning Web site owners about malicious code that redirects surfers to seemingly safe sites.

About 40,000 Web sites appear to have been compromised with rogue JavaScript code that redirects Web surfers to a fake Google Analytics site, after which they get passed onto a site that tries to exploit Internet Explorer or Firefox vulnerabilities to infect that PC with malware, according to a Websense researcher quoted by Computerworld. Just for good measure, if the site can't find a browser vulnerability, it tries to trick the user into downloading a Trojan.

It's not clear how the sites were compromised, but Computerworld reported the redirect sites are being hosted in the Ukraine, implying that the Russian Business Network is behind the threat.

This is a separate scam from the Gumblar attack that made the rounds last week, according to Websense.

The Real Deal 164: Chrome vs. Firefox

Tom and Rafe square off on whether Chrome or Firefox is best for your browsing.


Listen now:Download today's podcast
Subscribe now: iTunes (audio) | iTunes (video) | RSS (audio) | RSS (video)

E3 winner: Sony, Microsoft, or Nintendo?

With E3 returning to its old, bigger-is-better format, there seemed to be more at stake at this year's show. Could Nintendo provide enough compelling news to hold onto its lead? Would Microsoft trot out something to create new enthusiasm for its Xbox 360 platform? And could Sony reveal anything that might give it some much-needed momentum?

Alas, as it goes most of the time at E3, none of the companies truly hit it out of the park and a lot of what was announced was already leaked to greater or lesser degrees before the show started. However, that doesn't mean we can't try to objectively determine which companies did themselves some good--and which companies may not have.

Here's a quick recap of the news conferences from each camp and my quick assessments. But nevermind what I say, feel free to add your own comments--and try to be objective.





  • What's new: Expanded XBox Live audio/video offerings, Facebook and Twitter integration, full game downloads, and a strong selection of XBox 360 exclusives, including Halo: ODST, Forza Motorsport 3, Left4Dead2, Splinter Cell Conviction, and Metal Gear Solid Rising (this isn't an XBox 360 exclusive but it's the first MGS title to appear on the platform).
  • Big tease: You are the controller (Project Natal).
  • Biggest letdown: I was kind of hoping for a Zune portable gaming device, but all we got was the Zunebrand added to XBox Live.
  • Overall message: We're rounding out our already formidable XBox Live offering, serving up solid and sometimes innovative exclusives, and we have some cool motion-controller stuff that will be available for the platform--including existing systems--in the future.

  • What's new: Fresh Super Mario Brothers title and Super Mario Galaxy 2, Metroid Other M, Wii Fit Plus, Wii Motion Plus, Wii Vitality sensor.
  • Big tease: Nada (sorry, that isn't a code name for a new technology).
  • Biggest letdown: No big tease.
  • Overall message: We've expanded the gaming audience--and we're going to continue to expand it by doing just what we've been doing, improving our revolutionary motion controller, and adding the word "Plus" to some accessories and games.

  • What's new: PSP Go, expanded roster of PSP games and downloadable content, and impressive line-up of PS3 exclusive titles, including Uncharted 2, Gran Turismo 5, Modnation Racers, God of War 3 (March 2010), and the briefly mentioned Rockstar Games' Agent.
  • Big tease: Impressive new motion controller that uses the existing PlayStation Eye to rival or beat the Wii's motion controller (it's due out in spring 2010).
  • Biggest letdown: No new hardware configuration or price drop for the PS3; PSP should have been priced at $199.99.
  • Overall message: We're revamping and reinvigorating the PSP platform and feeding the PS3 with a bigger selection of triple-A exclusive titles that will make you want to buy the system, even if it costs $400.
In my book, I'd give the slight edge to Sony, if only because it was the only company to announce any new hardware (the PSP Go). While its new prototype motion controller seemed silly at first, the demo seemed more impressive and tangible than Microsoft's "future" demo. That said, if pressed, I'd say I lean toward the camp who thinks motion control--and motion controllers--are gimmicky and that Sony and Microsoft are being too reactive to Nintendo's success.

As for Nintendo, its whole presentation once again came across as more of a dud than a bang. But that hasn't hurt the company in the past, so Nintendo fans shouldn't be too worried, right?

Update: Added Super Mario Galaxy 2 and Metroid Other M to the "what's new" section of Nintendo. Both titles are slated for release next year.

eMusic raises prices as it signs Sony deal

Music subscription service eMusic has always puzzled me. While it was the first site to offer DRM-free downloads, I never downloaded enough music to justify paying even the lowest subscription rate. The fact that it makes you navigate a long sign-up screen and enter a credit card number before showing you the song selection and other features of the site--even if you just want a free trial--drives me nuts. But despite my skepticism, the site has some big fans among voracious consumers of indie music.

eMusic subscribers are not your typical music fans.

(Credit: Touchstone Pictures via IMDB)

Judging from the angry comments on the site's message board, some of those fans are up in arms. The company announced a deal Monday with major label Sony to add catalog tracks--that is, music released more than two years ago--from Sony artists. But eMusic barely mentioned the fact that it's raising prices at the same time. Specifically:

The lowest-priced Basic subscription ($11.99) now offers only 24 tracks per month (50 cents per track) instead of 30 (40 cents per track). Existing customers will be grandfathered into the old 30-song allotment, according to an eMusic spokesperson cited by the Los Angeles Times.

The mid-tier Plus subscription goes from $14.99 to $15.89 and offers only 35 tracks (45 cents per track) instead of 50 (30 cents per track).

The high-end Premium subscription goes from $19.99 to $20.79 per month and offers only 50 tracks (42 cents per track) instead of 75 (27 cents per track).

Subscribers may be angry, but they shouldn't be surprised. eMusic has periodically raised prices since introducing an all-you-can eat download plan for $10 a month back in 2000. Just look at the prices in CNET's review from 2004 (updated in 2006), and you'll notice that the company has cut download allotments almost in half since the review was written.

Subscription-based music is still an experiment. The royalty structure of the music business was set up to sell individual physical recordings. It's easier to translate that business model to individual downloads than it is to subscriptions. Still, raising prices during the worst economy in more than 50 years doesn't strike me as the best idea.

What really seems to be throwing eMusic fans off, however, is the timing: fair or not, they're blaming the Sony deal for the price increase. Most eMusic fans I've heard from are real music nuts, and are there to sample a wide range of music from relatively unknown cutting-edge acts, not to download music they could find anywhere. Imagine the clerks in High Fidelity suddenly being told that their favorite mail-order distributor is raising prices, but in exchange will now let them order ABBA and Chili Peppers records just like the chain stores in the mall.

IE6 forcing Bing as default search engine

Microsoft confirmed on Tuesday that it is looking into an issue in which users of Internet Explorer 6 are forced into having Bing as their default search engine.

"We are aware of the issue with Bing on machines running IE6 and are investigating a solution," Microsoft said in a statement. "This issue is not impacting IE7 and IE8 users."

Although it is only affecting its older browser, many people still use IE6 and Microsoft has faced a lot of regulatory scrutiny over how default search preferences are set and changed within Internet Explorer.

The issue crops up just as Microsoft plans to formally launch Bing. Among its planned promotions is a huge ad campaign as well as an event Tuesday night at Seattle's Space Needle.

The IE6 issue was noted earlier on Tuesday by Search Engine Land.

Tweet your favorite Flickr shots with Autopostr


Twitter and self-promotion go together like peanut butter and jelly, but without the right tools it takes work. I've recently begun using a handy service calledAutopostr that takes most of that work out of the equation, by posting whichever of my Flickr photos I want straight to Twitter with a minimal amount of effort.

On any photo or photos you wish to share with your Twitter buddies you simply add a hash (#) in the title or "autopostr" as a photo tag. The service scans your Flickr account every five minutes, and takes any of those tagged photos and sends them out as new tweets.

Now I wouldn't recommend doing this on more than two or three photos a day since it's a bit spammy, but this system provides a very quick and simple way to promote photos without having to use URL shorteners or sign into your Twitter account. It's also makes it simple to see which photos you've shared to Twitter by sorting out which ones have hashes in the titles or autopostr tags.

Worth noting is that Autopostr won't start sending out your marked photos as tweets until it verifies your information. It also doesn't tap into your Twitter account using the popular Oauth, so you'll have to give it your Twitter username and password for it to be able to post. Creator Tistan Teunissen tells me that's coming soon though.

See also:
flickr2twitter and You can now post pics to Twitter from Picnik

Autopostr checks to see if you added the tag or a # to your Flickr picture, and sends out a Tweet with a link to the image on your behalf.

(Credit: CNET)